Search for a command to run...
Progressive hints first, then the full explanation and implementation when you're ready to cash out.
Review status
AI-generated and still unreviewed. Double-check the details before internalizing them.
Hints
Open only as much as you need to keep the solve alive.
Treat the matrix entries as variables over . Every scan condition is just one linear equation, so the answer is , where is the dimension of the solution space.
The scan separates into a row part and a column part: it is “sum consecutive rows” followed by “sum consecutive columns”. So this is not really a scary 2D beast.
For one dimension, look at the matrix whose rows are length- consecutive blocks of ones. Its rows are linearly independent: the first row has a leftmost in a column no later row can touch, then repeat.
That means the rank of the row-scanning matrix is , and the rank of the column-scanning matrix is .
The full 2D linear map has rank equal to the product of those two ranks, so the number of free binary variables is The answer is to that power modulo .
Think of every cell as a variable over , because XOR is just addition modulo . The condition for each submatrix is one linear equation:
So the number of valid matrices is , where is the number of free variables after all independent constraints are applied.
The only real job is counting how many of those constraints are independent. Brute force is dead on arrival since go up to , so we need the structure.
Define a 1D interval-sum matrix for rows. It has rows and columns, where row has ones in columns . Similarly define for columns, with size .
For a matrix , all scanned XORs together are exactly:
We need:
Now count the rank of this linear map.
First, the 1D interval-sum matrix has full row rank. For , the first row has a in column , and no later row has a there. So row cannot be made from later rows. Remove it and repeat the same argument on column , then column , and so on. More formally, each row has a unique leftmost column among the remaining rows, so all rows are independent.
Therefore:
and similarly:
The map has rank
One way to see this: by invertible row/column changes, can be transformed into a matrix that keeps exactly independent row coordinates, and into one that keeps exactly independent column coordinates. Then simply exposes a block of size
so exactly that many independent linear constraints exist. No hidden extra constraints, no magic, no AI finding anything here. Just rank.
Thus the number of free variables is:
Every assignment to those free variables determines one valid matrix, so the answer is:
Edge cases also fall out cleanly:
The exponent can be around , so use long long. Fast exponentiation gives each test case in time.
Complexity per test case:
with memory.
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
using ll = long long;
const ll MOD = 998244353;
void setIO() {
ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
cin.tie(nullptr);
}
ll modPow(ll a, long long e) {
ll res = 1;
while (e > 0) {
if (e & 1) res = res * a % MOD;
a = a * a % MOD;
e >>= 1;
}
return res;
}
int main() {
setIO();
int t;
cin >> t;
while (t--) {
long long n, m, r, c;
cin >> n >> m >> r >> c;
long long constraints = (n - r + 1) * (m - c + 1);
long long freeVars = n * m - constraints;
cout << modPow(2, freeVars) << '\n';
}
}#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
using ll = long long;
const ll MOD = 998244353;
void setIO() {
ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
cin.tie(nullptr);
}
ll modPow(ll a, long long e) {
ll res = 1;
while (e > 0) {
if (e & 1) res = res * a % MOD;
a = a * a % MOD;
e >>= 1;
}
return res;
}
int main() {
setIO();
int t;
cin >> t;
while (t--) {
long long n, m, r, c;
cin >> n >> m >> r >> c;
long long constraints = (n - r + 1) * (m - c + 1);
long long freeVars = n * m - constraints;
cout << modPow(2, freeVars) << '\n';
}
}